<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Productive Conflict</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.azzarellogroup.com/blog/2008/11/14/productive-conflict/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.azzarellogroup.com/blog/2008/11/14/productive-conflict/</link>
	<description>Practical Insights on Business Leadership and Personal Success</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:46:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patty Azzarello&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Better with Less</title>
		<link>http://www.azzarellogroup.com/blog/2008/11/14/productive-conflict/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Patty Azzarello&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Better with Less</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 16:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azzarellogroup.com/blog/?p=167#comment-48</guid>
		<description>[...] your Work-at-Home Policy Work? Retaining Top People in this Ugly Economy Productive Conflict Squeezing the Oil out of Our Food [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] your Work-at-Home Policy Work? Retaining Top People in this Ugly Economy Productive Conflict Squeezing the Oil out of Our Food [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandeep Shouche</title>
		<link>http://www.azzarellogroup.com/blog/2008/11/14/productive-conflict/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep Shouche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azzarellogroup.com/blog/?p=167#comment-34</guid>
		<description>I agree with the article. I would just say a couple of things in addition.

1. The propensity to remain quiet rather than speak out is probably more common in certain cultures where deference to authority is expected. There, you need to take extra care that surfacing of conflicts do not cause morale issues.
2. I would actually put the onus on leaders to provide the right culture in the team. Very often, leaders would say they encourage differences of opinion, but would set a different example with their actions, body language, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the article. I would just say a couple of things in addition.</p>
<p>1. The propensity to remain quiet rather than speak out is probably more common in certain cultures where deference to authority is expected. There, you need to take extra care that surfacing of conflicts do not cause morale issues.<br />
2. I would actually put the onus on leaders to provide the right culture in the team. Very often, leaders would say they encourage differences of opinion, but would set a different example with their actions, body language, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.azzarellogroup.com/blog/2008/11/14/productive-conflict/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azzarellogroup.com/blog/?p=167#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Productive Conflict:
I find it insightful and intriguing that you have identified this phenomenon that is far too common in today’s corporate world and put it to forefront of discussion.  Kudos!  

I believe there are really two fundamentals aspects to this problem.  Let’s face it, it is a problem.

First, there’s the matter of communication.  I think the best leaders do a better job communicating the importance of action.  That their every interaction results in engaging discussion for the purpose of decision or action and they are rarely involved in discussion that results in talking “about” something without resolve.  I believe that people begin to identify with these individuals as the leaders who will move a topic, project or the business forward.  They establish themselves as leaders and personalities of action and their presence means “pay attention” and “speak up”, because something will result in every meeting.

Secondly, there’s credibility and relationship.  Are you known for taking the wrong action repeatedly, or driving action that is not among the organizations’ priorities?  I believe that having knowledge of what’s important to the business and winning battles that are aligned to the interests of the business is paramount.  You will quickly loose credibility if you’re always involved in matters that are of little consequence.  Or find yourself in conflict all the time.  Be supportive of others with good ideas and initiatives so you’re not always in the forefront of problems.  Be informed, have allies and earn the respect of those making the important decisions.  I have to believe that you soon find yourself as their peers. 

Signed, Greg in Calgary, Canada</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Productive Conflict:<br />
I find it insightful and intriguing that you have identified this phenomenon that is far too common in today’s corporate world and put it to forefront of discussion.  Kudos!  </p>
<p>I believe there are really two fundamentals aspects to this problem.  Let’s face it, it is a problem.</p>
<p>First, there’s the matter of communication.  I think the best leaders do a better job communicating the importance of action.  That their every interaction results in engaging discussion for the purpose of decision or action and they are rarely involved in discussion that results in talking “about” something without resolve.  I believe that people begin to identify with these individuals as the leaders who will move a topic, project or the business forward.  They establish themselves as leaders and personalities of action and their presence means “pay attention” and “speak up”, because something will result in every meeting.</p>
<p>Secondly, there’s credibility and relationship.  Are you known for taking the wrong action repeatedly, or driving action that is not among the organizations’ priorities?  I believe that having knowledge of what’s important to the business and winning battles that are aligned to the interests of the business is paramount.  You will quickly loose credibility if you’re always involved in matters that are of little consequence.  Or find yourself in conflict all the time.  Be supportive of others with good ideas and initiatives so you’re not always in the forefront of problems.  Be informed, have allies and earn the respect of those making the important decisions.  I have to believe that you soon find yourself as their peers. </p>
<p>Signed, Greg in Calgary, Canada</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
     
